Above the Law

Politicians have had their chance to talk. Now get yours!
Post Reply
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 3:33 pm
Location: Suburbs of Chicago

Above the Law

Post by ColonelConclusive » Fri Sep 15, 2006 3:41 pm

Have you ever been arrested in the city of Chicago? If so, was it between February of 2002 and December of 2004? If you answered yes to both of the above questions, then pay close attention to the next question? Did the arresting officer confiscate any money that was on your person? If so, chances are you didn’t get it back!

On January 14, 2003, one Elton Gates was arrested in the city of Chicago. He had $113 on his person. It was confiscated at the time of his arrest. Gates pleaded guilty to his charge and was placed on probation for the period of two years. He visited the police department’s evidence section and presented them with a receipt to retrieve his confiscated money. They refused to return that which rightfully belonged to him, but agreed to surrender his belongings if he obtained the signature of his arresting officer. He made numerous attempts to do so, but each attempt proved unsuccessful. The department’s negligence to do what was right prompted a visit to the office of Thomas Peters. He’s an attorney. On Monday, September 11, 2006, Thomas Peters filed a federal lawsuit against the Chicago Police Department. It contends that the city confiscated an estimated $25 million in cash (although it’s believed to be closer to $50 million) from people who were arrested. These confiscated monies were never returned to those arrested.

Logic would lead one to ask, “Well, where did the money go?” According to the Uniform Disposition of Unclaimed Property Act (a law created in 1954) these monies are to be distributed to the state treasurer. In turn, the state treasurer applies these monies to pension funds, specifically targeted towards retired teachers, judges, state workers, university employees, and state legislators. But, the state treasurer never received the confiscated funds from the Chicago Police Department.

Why? Well, according to Jennifer Hoyle, a spokeswoman for the City Corporation Counsel’s office, the UDUPA law of 1954 doesn’t apply to the Chicago Police Department. That sounds familiar. Instead the CPD relies upon the Law Enforcement Disposition of Property Act, which conveniently states that abandoned property may be disposed of by law enforcement officials.

That would be understandable if in fact an abandonment of the confiscated monies actually occurred. However, Mr. Elton Gates didn’t pull out $113 from his pocket, lay it on the curb, and walk away. This would indeed illustrate abandonment. No, Mr. Elton Gates, along with millions of other offenders, had money TAKEN, or rather STOLEN from him, and when he confronted the thieves, they not only refused to return that which did not rightfully belong to them, but they believe their actions were NOT in the wrong!

So, again the question remains; If an offender’s confiscated monies wasn’t returned to them, and it wasn’t given to the state treasurer, where, oh where did it go? If I was a betting man, I’d bet in never went anywhere. Instead, it remained in the arresting officer’s pocket.

Now, if you share the same sediments and you were a victim yourself of such injustice, feel free to contact Thomas Peters and explain your scenario, for he’s already filed a class action lawsuit on your behalf.

Post Reply